What are the Debt Limits for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy?

Click here to see the current Chapter 13 Debt Limits effective April 1, 2016 and valid through 2019.

As of the date of this post, the debt limits for Chapter 13 bankruptcy are $1,081,400 in secured debt plus $360,475 in unsecured debt (see the 2014 debt limits here). These limits include only debts that are not disputed, non-contingent and liquidated. This means that amounts which are not yet decided (for example, a potential award of attorney fees in a pending lawsuit) may not count toward these limits. Taxes (whether dischargeable tax or non-dischargeable tax) are included in the unsecured debt limit calculation and disputing a debt without cause generally does not remove it from either calculation.

These statutory debt limits for Chapter 13 are adjusted every three years and the next adjustment is scheduled to occur in 2013. Note: The 2014 Chapter 13 debt limits have been updated as of April 1, 2013.

If you exceed these Chapter 13 debt limits, you can still file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy assuming that all other eligibility criteria for Chapter 7 are met under the “means test”. However, if you are above the debt limits for Chapter 13 and also above the income qualification for Chapter 7, you may still file an individual Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, which is a more involved and expensive bankruptcy proceeding than Chapter 13 however an individual Chapter 11 has unique opportunities to reorganize certain debts with more favorable terms.

Lynn Wartchow is a bankruptcy attorney located in Edina, Minnesota and representing clients in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy proceedings throughout Minneapolis and St. Paul in Minnesota. Contact for a free consultation and more information on options available under Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

What Should I Expect at the 341 Bankruptcy Meeting of Creditors?

If you have done basic research into the bankruptcy process, you will know that about one month after filing a bankruptcy petition and schedules there will be a mandatory hearing called the “341 Meeting of Creditors”, which is named after the section of the Bankruptcy Code that requires the hearing.

Clients often ask what to expect at the Meeting of Creditors, what they should bring to the Meeting of Creditors and what creditors will be present at the Meeting of Creditors.

For most people, the Meeting of Creditors is relatively uneventful: it’s typically held at the federal courthouse in a hearing room with people who filed bankruptcy around the same date that you did and their attorneys, all waiting for their names to be called so they can sit for the few minutes of questioning by the bankruptcy trustee assigned to their case. When your name is called, you can expect to go up and sit at the hearing table across from the trustee, and then be sworn in under oath to tell the truth, to confirm your name and address and then to answer some basic yes/no questioning for several minutes. If you have fully disclosed everything to your attorney and on your bankruptcy schedules, there should be no surprises and nothing new that comes up during the Meeting of Creditors. In the vast majority of cases, the trustee’s job is routine and they blandly conduct this hearing to determine if there are any non-exempt assets and to get your required testimony on record.

What should I bring to the Meeting of Creditors? In Minnesota bankruptcy cases, you should plan to bring your driver’s license and social security card, all paystubs received since the date that your case was filed, and also a bank statement that confirms the balance in each bank account on the file date of your bankruptcy case. If the trustee wants more documentation, they will either request it at the Meeting of Creditors or from your attorney.

Who shows up at the Meeting of Creditors? Usually, just you, your attorney and the bankruptcy trustee are present for a Meeting of Creditors. It is rare that any creditor will appear for a Meeting of Creditors, even though all creditors will receive notice of the scheduled time and date at least 21 days prior to the hearing. However, the only creditors who typically show up are ex-spouses or ex-business partners that feel jilted by the bankruptcy or, in some rare cases, individuals who have something to reveal to the trustee that was may not have been fully disclosed in the bankruptcy petition and schedules. Rarely does an everyday unsecured creditor make an appearance at the Meeting of Creditors. Even if a creditor or other party-in-interest shows up for the Meeting of Creditors, they are only allowed to ask questions related to the information contained in the schedules and are not allowed to use the Meeting of Creditors as an opportunity to ask unrelated questions.

Many people understandably feel nervous about their upcoming Meeting of Creditors, and inevitably all feel much relief once it is favorably concluded without incident. As long as you have fully disclosed all information in your petition and to your attorney, and you have the required documents and IDs on the hearing date, then the Meeting of Creditors should pose no concern. If you still feel anxious, just ask your attorney to spend a little more time helping you prepare for the Meeting of Creditors and/or provide a list of the sample questions asked at the Meeting of Creditors.

Keep reading for the Typical Questions Asked at the Chapter 7 Meeting of Creditors

Wartchow Law Office is a bankruptcy law firm located in Edina, Minnesota with  an exclusive practice in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy law,  representing individual consumer and business clients throughout the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota.

Foreclosure in Minnesota: Know the Process, Timeline and How Bankruptcy Can Help

Home foreclosures in Minnesota are common and arguably are even on the rise despite an improving real estate market. In April 2012, the Star Tribune reported that while foreclosures were slightly down during the first quarter of 2012, signs still point to an 11 percent increase in Minnesotans facing foreclosure, adding that one in 312 Minnesota homeowners have received some sort of notice of foreclosure.

Home foreclosure in Minnesota happens via one of two legal proceedings: either the lender forecloses by advertisement or the lender forecloses by action. This post only discusses foreclosure by advertisement, which is the more common of the two Minnesota home foreclosure processes.

In a foreclosure by advertisement, the defaulting homeowner will typically receive one or more pre-foreclosure notices that warn of their lender’s intent to start the foreclosure process if payments are not brought current within a specified time. The time between the first default in mortgage payments and a homeowner’s receipt of the pre-foreclosure notice can be one to three months or more, depending on the lender and any efforts the homeowner may be making to do a workout with their lender. After the pre-foreclosure notice has gone out and the homeowner still has not brought their mortgage current, the lender will then serve the homeowner with a notice of sheriff’s sale. While the Minnesota laws governing service of process in a foreclosure proceeding are detailed, most homeowners are served in-person with the foreclosure papers at their home address. The Notice of Sheriff’s Sale, sometimes also called the auction notice, will provide the date, time and location of the upcoming sheriff’s sale, usually to be held six weeks after the date of service and at the county sheriff’s office. Once the sheriff’s sale has come and passed, ownership of the home transfers to the winning bidder (which is usually the lender for the first mortgage on the home) and the homeowner then has his or her redemption period to reside in the home before vacating it permanently. The length of the redemption period varies according to circumstances, but is most often six months from the date of the sheriff’s sale.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy can help a homeowner save their home from foreclosure by providing an avenue to repay the mortgage arrears over three to five years in a Chapter 13 plan. In fact, mortgage arrears is one of the most Common Reasons for Filing Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in Minnesota. If the homeowner can afford to make the monthly Chapter 13 plan payments, their mortgage may be brought current at the end of the Chapter 13 plan, in addition to the discharge of other debts allowed in bankruptcy.

Chapter 7 can stall the foreclosure process for two or more months and, like Chapter 13 bankruptcy, can also serve to discharge any deficiency owed on the second mortgage. While Chapter 7 bankruptcy will not help to resolve any mortgage arrears owed so that the homeowner can save their home, it can buy more time in the house before the homeowner must leave.

Keep reading for more information about How to Postpone a Sheriff’s Sale in Minnesota.

While Minnesota law governs the foreclosure process, the terms of a mortgage also govern a homeowner’s rights and a lender’s ability to foreclose. For more information on the foreclosure process in Minnesota and how Chapter 13 or Chapter 7 bankruptcy may help, contact Wartchow Law Office for a free bankruptcy consultation to understand your options.

What is the “Means Test” and Why Does it Matter in Bankruptcy?

The “Means Test” was one of the major and most controversial additions to consumer bankruptcy law that occurred as part of the 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”). Part of the congressional intent of BAPCPA was to limit a person’s ability to obtain Chapter 7 relief and instead direct them into filing Chapter 13. While there are many reasons why some consumer debtors actually prefer to file Chapter 13 bankruptcy, Chapter 7 is still widely available and common, only now with a few additional hurdles to pass.

These “hurdles” to qualify to Chapter 7 that were added in 2005 as part of BAPCPA are collectively referred to as the “Means Test”. In actuality, the Means Test is an 8-page calculation that determines one’s eligibility for Chapter 7 using criteria such as the debtor’s income (as based on the last six months), household size, expenses and any special circumstances that may justify relief under Chapter 7 bankruptcy. While many of the numbers used are drawn from IRS standard allowances for food, utilities, and similar routine expenses, a person’s actual payments made monthly on secured debts such as mortgages and car loans are included to reduce their income. Generally speaking, if a person has no disposable income remaining at the end of the month after payment of all these standard and actual expenses, they may qualify for Chapter 7.

However, if when the last six months of income is annualized (i.e., doubled) and the person falls above the median income for their household size and state, they are instead steered toward filing Chapter 13, which includes a monthly repayment plan. As of 11/01/2015, the median income in Minnesota for a household of one person is $51,199, for two people $68,515, for three people $80,804, and $98,447 for four people. The median income adjusts at least once per year and these amounts reflect the median income as last adjusted on November 1, 2015 which will again be adjusted in April of 2016.

Even if someone is above the median income for Minnesota, they may still qualify for Chapter 7 (also referred to as “passing the Means Test”) based on other circumstances.

One job of your bankruptcy attorney is to give you all your bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy options, including calculating the Means Test for you and advising you on whether you qualify for Chapter 7 or if you may want or need to file Chapter 13 instead.

Wartchow Law Office is a law firm located in Edina, Minnesota with an exclusive practice in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy law, representing individual consumer and business clients throughout the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota.

 

What is the “Credit Counseling” Requirement to File Bankruptcy?

A credit counseling course must be completed before an individual can file bankruptcy. This course basically goes through your budget and educates on how to prioritize certain expenses, save money and manage a household budget.

While every individual who files for Chapter 7, Chapter 13 or even Chapter 11 bankruptcy is required to complete this credit counseling course before filing bankruptcy, this class is relatively simple and some even find it useful.

What you should know about the credit counseling course:

  • You can take the course online, over the phone or in person.
  • The course usually costs around $25 if you take it online or over the phone.
  • Once completed, you will be issued a Certificate of Credit Counseling, which you must provide to your bankruptcy attorney for filing with the court.
  • Have your attorney’s email address handy when you take the course so the agency can forward the certificate directly to your bankruptcy attorney.
  • A Certificate of Credit Counseling is only valid for 180 days. If you do not plan to file for bankruptcy for another six months or more, you may wish to hold off on taking the class until closer to the file date.
  • It must be taken from an approved credit counseling agency in Minnesota (for Minnesota bankruptcy filers).
  • You will also have to take a second course after you file bankruptcy but before you get a discharge. This second course is called “Debtor Education” or “Financial Management” and the process is similar to taking the first course. This second certificate must be filed with the bankruptcy court before you can receive a bankruptcy discharge. You do not have to take the second course from the same agency that you took the Credit Counseling.

A list of the approved Credit Counseling and Debtor Education agencies can be found on the US Department of Justice website at www.justice.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/index.htm.

Lynn Wartchow represents clients in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 in Minneapolis, Edina and Twin Cities Minnesota consumer bankruptcy proceedings. Consultations are free.

Bankruptcy and Divorce: What Should Come First?

Divorce is often a precursor to bankruptcy, for either one or both of the divorcing spouses find themselves in need of discharging debts in the face of earning only a single income once again. The difficult question is determining what should come first: the bankruptcy or the divorce.

The answer of course depends on a multitude of circumstances including whether the spouses can cooperate and agree to a joint (and amicable) bankruptcy filing before the divorce is finalized, how long it may be before a divorce decree is entered, which assets owned jointly versus individually, whether there are any joint debts, how the incomes of each of spouse may affect a joint bankruptcy both during a bankruptcy proceeding and after the divorce is final.

When divorce and bankruptcy overlap, the first question is timing. Often family  attorneys may advise their clients to file a bankruptcy before finalizing the divorce, which has the optimistic effect of clearing up those debts so the divorce decree has one less thing to divide up between the spouses. However, there are reasons why it may be better to wait to file bankruptcy until after the divorce is complete, especially for debtors that may owe monetary obligations to their ex-spouse as part of the divorce decree. While child support and alimony (or maintenance, as it is sometimes called) that are based on the financial need of the other spouse are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, certain other financial obligations to one’s ex-spouse may be dischargeable in bankruptcy, including property settlements and other financial obligations that are not based on the financial need of the other spouse. Under some situations, these types of divorce decree obligations can be discharged in a Minnesota consumer bankruptcy filed under Chapter 13.

Another reason to wait to file bankruptcy until after a divorce is finalized: a divorce decree can slap a debt back on one spouse, effectively mooting the entire reason for filing bankruptcy. In Minnesota—which is not a community property state—one spouse typically cannot be held liable for debts incurred solely by their spouse unless both spouses signed the credit agreement (there are some exceptions, such as medical debts which can be enforced against one’s spouse under state statute). A divorce decree usually divides all debts amongst the spouses. For example, the husband may assume the entire responsibility for all joint  and individual credit cards in his name while the wife will take over the homestead and accompanying home mortgages and individual credit cards in her name. If the husband files bankruptcy before the divorce is finalized and discharges his legal responsibility to his credit card companies, the divorce decree can still subject the husband to responsibility to his wife for any payments she is forced to make on the joint credit cards that she will still owe in spite of his bankruptcy because she did not file with him. In this example, while the credit card companies could not sue the husband because of his discharge received in bankruptcy, however they could still sue the wife for the joint debts and the wife, in turn, can then sue her ex-husband for indemnification under the divorce decree if she is forced to pay on the joint credit card debts that were otherwise assigned to him. The point is that you never know how the debts will be divided until the stamp is dry on the divorce decree, and you don’t want to waste a bankruptcy discharge (which you can only get once every 8 years) on debts that may be re-assigned to you in the divorce.

Other issues to be considered when bankruptcy and divorce intersect: equity in a  homestead may not be exempt if it is no longer one’s homestead (a marital lien alone does not satisfy “occupancy” to obtain a Minnesota homestead exemption); child support and spousal maintenance counts as income for the purposes of qualification for Chapter 7 under the means test; an indemnification clause in the divorce decree may undermine the effect of a bankruptcy discharge; unless a full disclosure is made and the divorcing spouses are cooperative, the bankruptcy attorney may have conflict of interest issues that prevent joint representation of divorcing spouses.

Lynn Wartchow is a bankruptcy attorney located in Edina, Minnesota and representing clients in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy proceedings throughout Minneapolis and St. Paul in Minnesota. 

Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: A Primer

Most often the people that come to me for help in bankruptcy do not initially know the difference between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which Chapter may be better for them or even which form of bankruptcy protection they qualify for.

The similarities between these two Chapters are fairly straightforward: both are forms of consumer bankruptcy protection that can discharge debts such as credit cards, medical liabilities, home mortgage deficiencies, personal guarantees and even taxes. Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 require that a petition and schedules be filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, listing all assets, creditors and certain financial information for the last two years. Both require one mandatory appearance with a bankruptcy trustee at what’s called the “341 Meeting of Creditors”. Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy  are eligible for a discharge of some or all of the debtor’s debts.

The differences are distinct and some of the forms of protection afforded under each Chapter need to be understood. Chapter 7 is what’s called a “straightforward” or “liquidation” bankruptcy: once filed, your assets are reviewed to see if you have non-exempt assets which need to be turned over to the trustee, and within three months a discharge of the debts is ordered. Chapter 7 has income qualifications under the “means test”, in that you generally must be around or below the median income for the state of Minnesota in order to qualify. As of May 1, 2012, the median income in Minnesota for one person is $47,618 or $63,101 for a household of two, $74,050 for a family of three, $86,910 for a household of four, and so on. If your gross household income is above this threshold, you are generally steered toward Chapter 13 bankruptcy instead.

Chapter 13 is distinctly different than Chapter 13 in that it requires a monthly payment of three to five years to be made to the Chapter 13 trustee under a Chapter 13 plan. After the successful completion of all monthly payments made under the Chapter 13 plan, the debtor is then discharged of any remaining debt. Unlike most Chapter 7 cases where creditors usually receive zero money, Chapter 13 affords most creditors some fractional repayment of the total amount owed. Determining the monthly Chapter 13 payment is something that your bankruptcy attorney will need to help determine using Minnesota standard allowances and some actual expenses, such as mortgage and car payments, domestic support obligations and other monthly liabilities that are not necessarily discharged in bankruptcy.

Most recently, homeowners have been taking more advantage of Chapter 13 bankruptcy to strip a second or even third mortgage on their homes. This is relatively new law in Minnesota and as of the date of this post is still pending on appeal in the 8th Circuit. Nevertheless, most other states recognize second mortgage stripping and Minnesota is following that trend. Your bankruptcy lawyer can help determine when a mortgage may be strippable in Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

In order to understand what form of bankruptcy protection is right for you and what you want to achieve long-term, you should consult a bankruptcy attorney for assistance that is specific to your situation. Wartchow Law Office is an exclusive bankruptcy practice offering free consultations to analyze your circumstances and offer practical guidance on your options in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy and even on-bankruptcy alternatives.

Located in Edina, Minnesota, Lynn Wartchow represents clients in all Chapters of bankruptcy in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Ramsey and Hennepin County, and throughout
Minnesota.

When Will I Owe a “Deficiency” after Foreclosure in Minnesota? It Depends.

Under some circumstances after foreclosure, a deficiency may still be owed on a foreclosed property. A deficiency or “deficiency judgment” is obtained by some lenders (a.k.a. “mortgagees”) after a foreclosure on real estate where the sales price of the property does not cover the balance due on the mortgage plus related any fees and costs. The amount of the deficiency is usually the difference between the total amount due on the note including expenses and costs and the amount received from the foreclosure sale (or the fair market value of the mortgaged property if the property is agricultural).

Typically under the Minnesota Anti-Deficiency Statute (Minn. Stat. 582.30), a homeowner is protected from owing a deficiency on the first mortgage on foreclosed homestead real estate. This protection only applies to certain, although common, circumstances where the property is the owner’s home and the foreclosure process was conducted as a foreclosure by advertisement. If the property is not homestead, or otherwise if the owner moves out of the property or the property is foreclosed by action, Minnesota’s statutory protection against a deficiency may not apply.

Indications that no deficiency may be owed on a foreclosed home:

  • Property is classified as a homestead property
  • The home’s value is more than what was owed on the mortgage (i.e., the home had equity)
  • Foreclosure was conducted as a “foreclosure by advertisement”
  • Mortgage in question was the first mortgage
  • Home was not abandoned before the foreclosure process was complete
  • A discharge was received in prior bankruptcy and no refinance or reaffirmation of the mortgage has occurred since

Indications that a deficiency may be owed on a foreclosed home:

  • The property was non-homestead property, i.e. rental, agricultural or commercial property
  • The amount due on the mortgage exceeds the value or sales price of the property (i.e., no equity exists in the property)
  • Mortgage in question was the second or third mortgage (i.e., any mortgage other than first priority lien)
  • Foreclosure was conducted as a “foreclosure by action”
  • Instead of foreclosure, the property was short sold, surrendered or transferred back to the lender by a deed in lieu

A discharge in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 (or Chapter 11) bankruptcy relieves a debtor from owing a deficiency on a foreclosed mortgage in most instances. In order to understand your rights and the potential liability for deficiency that you may face, you should contact an attorney to review the real estate property and foreclosure process applicable to you.

Lynn Wartchow is the founding attorney of Wartchow Law Office located in Edina, MN and represents individual consumer and business bankruptcy clients in the Minneapolis / St. Paul and greater Twin Cities metro area in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings filed in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota. Wartchow Law Office also represents consumer debtors in bankruptcy proceedings filed in the Western District of Wisconsin.

Defined: The Bankruptcy “Trustee” and the “United States Trustee”

The terms “trustee” and “United States Trustee” sound similar and often encompass similar objectives, however the role of the trustee in bankruptcy proceeding is distinctly different than that of the United States Trustee.

The “United States Trustee” (also called the U.S. Trustee or “UST”) is essentially a federal office within the U.S. Department of Justice that oversees the administration of all bankruptcy cases in a certain district. Here in the district of Minnesota as in other districts, the office of the U.S. Trustee employs a group of staff attorneys, financial analysts and other professionals all charged with the responsibility to promote the efficiency and protect the integrity of the federal bankruptcy system. The Office of the US Trustee does not always directly engage in consumer Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings, however does monitor each case to determine whether legal action needs to be taken in order to enforce the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and to prevent fraud or abuse. The UST often reviews petition and schedules filed with the Court to determine whether fraud exists or if an audit must be conducted to uncover more information. However in the majority of consumer Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, the individual debtors will never hear from the United States Trustee or be subject to its action. In Chapter 11 cases, the Office of the US Trustee becomes a principal player in monitoring the business reorganization proceeding.

In contrast, the “trustee” (also called a “panel trustee” or a “standing trustee” in Chapter 13 cases) is often a private attorney charged with the responsibility to administer a bankruptcy, hold the meeting of creditors, and distribute any non-exempt assets to creditors. A bankruptcy trustee is appointed to every individual’s Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 consumer bankruptcy case. In the District of Minnesota, there are approximately 25 such attorneys that serve as Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 trustees. Unlike the US Trustee whose main objective is to ensure the integrity of the bankruptcy process, the role of the Chapter 7 trustee is to collect any non-exempt assets of the debtor, liquidates those assets, and then distribute the proceeds to creditors. In Chapter 13, the trustee additionally evaluates the debtor’s financial affairs, makes recommendations to the Court with regard to the Chapter 13 plan and ultimately administers a the Chapter 13 plan by collecting payments from the debtor and disbursing the funds to creditors. In Chapter 11, no trustee is initially appointed and the debtor effectively operates as its own trustee, i.e., the “debtor in possession”.

Lynn Wartchow is the founding attorney of Wartchow Law Office located in Edina, Minnesota and representing consumer and business clients in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings throughout the Minneapolis and St. Paul and surrounding areas.

Received a Form 1099-C on Foreclosed Home? You May Qualify for the Mortgage Forgiveness Exclusion to Cancellation of Debt Income.

If you receive a Form 1099-C reporting ‘debt cancellation’ income after a home foreclosure, you may qualify for the Mortgage Forgiveness exclusion. As if the distress of home foreclosure isn’t enough, homeowners may receive a Form 1099-C from their former mortgage lender reporting the deficiency owed as income to the homeowner. The income reported on the Form 1099-C is what’s referred to as “Cancellation of Debt Income” or “Discharge of Indebtedness Income”, both of which generally must be reported as taxable income on an individual’s Form 1040 federal and state tax returns. When the 1099 relates to foreclosed real estate, the amount of cancelled debt can be significant and can consequently result in a substantial increase in tax liability for that year, loss of tax refunds or even additional tax liabilities owed to the IRS and Minnesota Department of Revenue.

For a more detailed discussion on tax debt and other tax resolution issues, be sure to read Wartchow Law’s Tax Blog.

Typically, cancellation of debt is an income realization event that must be reported on one’s tax returns. The idea is that any amount of principal or interest that a person legally owes but does not have to repay is considered taxable income in the year that such debt is cancelled. As an illustration, if you owe a commercial lender $15,000 between interest and principal due on a loan but that creditor agrees to accept $5,000 and cancel the other $10,000 in satisfaction of the full amount, that creditor is required by federal law to issue an IRS Form 1099-C, which reports the $10,000 cancelled debt as taxable income to you. Depending on the circumstances, the amount reported on Form 1099 must be included as personal income unless a statutory exclusion applies. Most of the IRS’s income exclusions are conditioned upon insolvency of the taxpayer—i.e., total debts exceed total fair market value of all assets—however bankruptcy is not necessarily required to qualify under certain IRS insolvency exclusions. Even in the absence of insolvency, a homeowner may still qualify for the Mortgage Forgiveness exclusion.

The Mortgage Forgiveness exclusion is provided under the Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007, which allows most taxpayers to exclude 1099 income resulting from the discharge of debt on their principal residence. The key to qualifying for this exclusion is that the debt must have been incurred to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence and the debt must have been secured by your principal residence. Most traditional mortgages on homestead properties would meet this criteria. Currently, the Mortgage Debt Relief Act only applies through 2012, after which it may be extended by additional act of Congress.

When an individual files for bankruptcy, Section 108 of the Internal Revenue Code automatically excludes any debt that was discharged in the bankruptcy from taxable income. This is why consumer debtors who receive a discharge in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding rarely receive a 1099 regarding any of the discharged debts (and if you do, you should talk to your tax preparer about your options to dispute the 1099).

Wartchow Law Office is a law firm located in Edina, Minnesota with  an exclusive practice in Chapter 7, Chapter 13 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy law,  representing individual consumer and business clients throughout the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota.

For more information on The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act and Debt Cancellation, see IRS Publication 4681 and IRS Form 982 available on the IRS website at www.irs.gov. You should always ask your tax professional for tax advice and not rely on information found online. This information is intended for entertainment purposes only and use of any information from this site or any other web site referred to is for general information only and does not represent personal tax advice either express or implied. You are encouraged to seek professional tax advice for personal income tax questions and assistance.